Pennsylvania Licensing Board Takes Action Against Israeli Psychologist

licensing board

Licensing board decisions rarely make headlines, but in this case, an example is being made of an Israeli psychologist who practiced across state boundaries. In one of the most notable decisions ever announced related to telemental health licensure, the Pennsylvania psychology licensing board has taken action to stop a psychologist located in Israel from delivering psychological services to Pennsylvania citizens. Dr. Joseph Abraham is not licensed in Pennsylvania, but used a Pennsylvania address on his website from which to advertise his telepsychology services. While licensing boards have privately taken a number of similar actions against professionals licensing their services across state borders, this case is notable because it is being publicly disseminated in a newsletter published by the Professional Licensing Report.

The publishing of this article can be interpreted as a reminder to practitioners working over state lines to become educated about their need to adhere to state licensing law. Licensing boards are being approached by both citizens and professionals seeking more flexibility in where and how a licensed professional can work with clients and patients online.The TeleMental Health Institute is increasingly getting reports from clinicians and other services seeking education after being approached by licensing boards after the boards approaching clinicians who advertise their services online without proper licensure.

While many boards are in the process of working toward sustainable change in licensure mobility (also known as “licensure portability”),  a first order of business is the obvious need to enforce laws that are already on the books. While clinicians have been working over state borders via the Internet for almost two decades without much repercussion, we can expect that actions from boards like the Pennsylvania Board are likely to curtail many relatively unregulated interjurisdicitonal telepractices. We then can expect licensure laws to be modified so as to allow states to work more cohesively to regulate practices over state and national borders. Such dramatic change is likely to require several more years. Meanwhile, clinicians are advised by TMHI to work within their own states licensure and to be fully aware of both general and specific laws and ethical requirements related to telepractice.

If you’d like to learn more, see the TeleMental Health Institute’s webinars and Certification training to help you understand and be compliant with these and other laws for telepractice:

Rate this post!

(5 raters, 24 scores, average: 4.80 out of 5)

4 comments on “Pennsylvania Licensing Board Takes Action Against Israeli Psychologist

  1. Where can I get information about continuing sessions while my client leaves his boarding school, travels home to Pennsylvania for two weeks, and then returns to boarding school? While at school our sessions are face to face. I am a Distance Credentialed Counselor already and fully licensed in NH and ME.
    Thank you

    • Oh my! If you have been certified as a DCC, you must be disappointed to not have gotten this information from your trainer(s).

      In our training, interjurisdictional practice (the issue you mention about practicing over state lines) is a foundational concept that we cover from here to kingdom come… Not to worry. We have an upcoming webinar (September 23 at 2 PM Eastern) that might give you some of the information you need, and at a very reasonable price. If you attend the live event, the audience will also be able to ask questions. It also comes with 1 CE that most behavioral professionals can apply to their licensure renewal applications. See this page “7 Biggest Mistakes Made by Mental Health Professionals Practicing Over State Lines” for details. After the live event, all this information is going to be available with all our other on-demand training topics, here in the TBHI On-Demand Library.

      BTW, we previously offered the training for DCC but in January of 2017, decided to terminate our contract with them and go with another, more competency-based certification group. If you want details, see the Coalition for Technology in Behavioral Science website. Realizing the lack of evidence-based, competency-based training for telebehavioral health, I and a large interdisciplinary group of noted (and published) telebehavioral colleagues decided to research, publish and promulgate the evidence-based competencies upon which CTiBS has based their credentialing service. That credentialing service is what you can see on this CTiBS Rationale and CTiBS Telebehavioral Health Practitioner Credentialing webpage.

Leave a Reply

Name and email are required. Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.