Virtual Training

Virtual Training in Behavioral Health: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Implementing Contingency Management Protocols

MARLENE MAHEU, PhD

September 26, 2023 | Reading Time: 3 Minutes
166

Please support Telehealth.org’s ability to deliver helpful news, opinions, and analyses by turning off your ad blocker. How

Introduction: The Imperative for Effective Training in Evidence-Based Practices

The economic impact of substance use disorders in the United States exceeds $500 billion annually (CEA, 2017). The swift and effective implementation of Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs) like Contingency Management (CM) is urgent. Historically, training for EBPs has been conducted in person, often in a workshop format featuring observational and experiential learning elements (Walters et al., 2005; Sholomskas et al., 2005). , including motivational interviewing (Miller et al., 2004). However, the COVID-19 pandemic prompted a pivot towards virtual platforms for professional education. While virtual training has obvious cost-saving implications by reducing travel and venue hire expenses, research is needed to determine how it compares to traditional in-person training regarding utility and cost-effectiveness.

Methodology: Capturing a Unique Opportunity

A study by Bryan Hartzler and several colleagues was recently published in the Journal for Technology in Behavioral Science (CTiBS). The researchers leveraged a natural experiment from a larger cluster-randomized type 3 hybrid trial, MIMIC, focused on CM implementation in Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) (Becker et al., 2021). An initial cohort of clinicians from eight OTPs received in-person training, while a later cohort from ten OTPs underwent virtual training. Both groups were assessed post-training using a validated fidelity instrument to evaluate their readiness and proficiency in delivering CM protocols (Curran et al., 2012; Aarons et al., 2011).

Virtual Training Outperforms In-Person Approaches

Benchmarks: Readiness and Proficiency

The outcomes revealed a 12-14% higher attainment rate of readiness and proficiency benchmarks among clinicians who received virtual training.

Cost-Effectiveness: A Noteworthy Differential

Not only did virtual training prove to be more effective in preparing clinicians, but it also resulted in a per-clinician cost-saving of $399 compared to in-person training. The study employed an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) to quantify this differential, ultimately identifying virtual training as the dominant strategy across a range of willingness-to-pay values.

Implications: Redefining the Future of Behavioral Health Training Utility Beyond the Pandemic

While the COVID-19 pandemic acted as a catalyst for the rapid adoption of virtual training platforms, the evidence suggests that the benefits of this modality extend beyond the current crisis. Virtual training has proven not only to be a viable alternative but, in some aspects, a preferable method for preparing clinicians to implement EBPs like CM.

Informing Policy and Practice

These findings present compelling arguments for using virtual training in behavioral health settings. Policymakers and organizational decision-makers are encouraged to recognize the utility, affordability, and cost-effectiveness of virtual training as a potent tool for fast-tracking the implementation of EBPs.

Conclusion: Virtual Training as a Paradigm Shift

The shift from in-person to virtual training was initially viewed as a necessary but temporary response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the current study illuminates that virtual training is not just a stop-gap solution but a superior strategy, both in terms of utility and cost-effectiveness, for implementing complex behavioral health interventions like CM.

Virtual Training at Telehealth.org: A Decade of Excellence and Accessibility

While this study fills a vital gap in understanding the efficacy and economy of virtual training, it’s worth noting that Telehealth.org has been pioneering in this domain since 2010. With more than 80 hours of accredited Continuing Medical Education (CME) and Continuing Education (CE) training available 24/7, Telehealth.org offers an expansive suite of high-quality virtual training. Many of these are available at discounted costs, reflecting our commitment to developing master-class training available to the broadest audience possible. This is particularly important in a landscape where the cost and utility of virtual training are ever more scrutinized.

Telehealth.org’s offerings dovetail perfectly with the findings of this study, reinforcing the importance of virtual training as a cost-effective and practical approach to preparing behavioral and medical professionals for the challenges ahead.

References

Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & McCue Horwitz, S. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services, 38(1), 4–23.

Becker, S. J., Murphy, C. M., Hartzler, B., Rash, C. J., Janssen, T., Roosa, M., Madden, L. M., & Garner, B. R. (2021). Project MIMIC (Maximizing Implementation of Motivational Incentives in Clinics): A cluster-randomized type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. Addiction Science and Clinical Practice, 16(1), 61.

Cross-Technology Transfer Center Workgroup on Virtual Learning. (2021). Virtual reality for behavioral health workforce development in the era of COVID-19. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 121, 108157.

Walters, S. T., Matson, S. A., Baer, J. S., & Ziedonis, D. M. (2005). Effectiveness of workshop training for psychosocial addiction treatments: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 29(4), 283-293.


Curran, G. M., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., Pyne, J. M., & Stetler, C. (2012). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: Combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Medical Care,50(3), 217–226.

Intensive Telehealth Group Therapy Digital Workshop

Nervous about conducting telehealth group therapy? Many highly skilled group therapy providers have been forced into telehealth practice without thoughtful guidance on how to conduct evidence-based telehealth group therapy. The Telebehavioral Health Institute has organized two interlocking training experiences to help you learn by doing. These events are available as a package with both segments. They demonstrate the how and why of telehealth group therapy.

Advanced Telehealth Clinical Best Practices: Complex Cases & Emergencies

3-hour Clinical Telehealth Issues II training is designed to help you handle complex cases when working through telehealth.

Evidence-Based & Practical Telesupervision Digital Workshop

Looking for evidence-based TELESUPERVISION training? TBHI brings you “do’s and don’ts” to keep you legal & ethical.

Disclaimer: Telehealth.org offers information as educational material designed to inform you of issues, products, or services potentially of interest. We cannot and do not accept liability for your decisions regarding any information offered. Please conduct your due diligence before taking action. Also, the views and opinions expressed are not intended to malign any organization, company, or individual. Product names, logos, brands, and other trademarks or images are the property of their respective trademark holders. There is no affiliation, sponsorship, or partnership suggested by using these brands unless contained in an ad. Some of Telehealth.org’s blog content is generated with the assistance of ChatGPT. We do not and cannot offer legal, ethical, billing technical, medical, or therapeutic advice. Use of this site constitutes your agreement to Telehealth.org Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

Was this article helpful?
YesNo

Please share your thoughts in the comment box below.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Register for Free

Receive Any of Our 57 FREE Newsletters!

REGISTER

Most Popular Blog Topics

You May Also Like…